Draft 0.1
Opening and Introductions
Dick Somes, DEC, called
the meeting to order and asked members to introduce themselves.
After introductions the minutes from the previous meeting were
reviewed. There being no changes a motion was made, seconded,
and passed all in favor to accept the minutes as written.
Agenda Review
The agenda was reviewed.
One change was made to add Jim Pangburn, Fermi, to discuss software
standards on Thursday at 1:30 PM. The agenda was accepted as
amended.
Call for Patent Disclosure
Dick Somes read the VSO
Patent Disclosure Policy and asked for the disclosure of any patents.
No patents were presented. Mike Munroe, ERNI, asked if previously
disclosed patents needed to be reviewed again. Dick Somes stated
that one disclosure was sufficient.
General Announcements.
Rick O'Connor, Tundra, announced
that DY4 and Tundra Semiconductor would sponsor an evening on
the town in honor of the VSO's visit to Ottawa. Flyers were made
available in the back of the room.
Canvass Ballot Review, John Rynearson, VITA
John noted that two standards
VITA 4, IP Modules, and VITA 13, HIC, have gone through the ANSI
canvass ballot process and have been submitted to ANSI for process
review. Normally, ANSI will respond within 4-6 weeks after submittal.
John stated that he expected to hear from ANSI within the next
several weeks.
VITA 12, M-Modules, has
completed the first phase of pre-ballot solicitation. Only 8
balloters are currently on the list. More will be solicited in
order to provide balance between users and manufacturers.
VITA 10, Skychannel is in
negative ballot review. Richard Jaenicke, Sky, stated that he
hoped to have the review completed shortly so that a recirculation
ballot could begin if required. John noted that he had asked
and been granted from ANSI an extension through the end of 1996
for this proposed standard. A recirculation ballot is required
if significant changes are made to the specification as a result
of the negative ballot review.
Executive Director Report, Ray Alderman, VITA
Ray noted that ANSI had
recently completed an audit of the VITA standards development
process and asked John Rynearson to report on the results. John
stated that the audit had gone well and that ANSI had questioned
only four minor issues. In all, the ANSI auditor, Jay Moskowitz,
was very please with the audit and commended the VITA staff and
the members of the VSO for their positive spirit in the development
and promotion of standards.
Ray noted that VITA continues
to develop its web site to provide value to the members and noted
the distinction between commercial and non commercial parts of
VITA's web site.
VME2000, LLC - Corporate Activity Report, Ray Alderman
VME2000 has been set up
as a limited liability corporation, LLC. Ray is the manager.
Membership in the LLC is $3000 and the singular goal of the activity
is to carry out a backplane simulation of the VMEbus to ensure
the success of the VME64x efforts . The group is still accepting
members.
VME2000 Preliminary Simulation Report, Wayne Fischer, FORCE
Phase I of the simulation
has been completed. At this time the report is for VME2000 members
only. The results of the final report will be folded into the
VME64x document. Joe Bedard, HP, asked whether or not the group
should take 2eVME out of VME64x document to allow more time for
analysis. Dennis Terry, Heurikon, asked for agreement that the
VSO membership decouple 2eVME from VME64x if all 2eVME protocol
and electrical issues are not resolved by the September VSO meeting.
The VME2000 LLC group scheduled a breakfast meeting for Thursday,
July 25, at 7:30 - 9:00 AM to further discuss the preliminary
report.
ETL Update, Wayne Fischer
Wayne stated that he will
wait for the VME64x task group ballot and will do the ballot on
ETL at that time.
VME64x Report, Wayne Fischer
Wayne distributed a new
draft and passed out an edit proposal to the 1.2 draft. Wayne
discussed changing the name to VME64x. No objections were heard.
Wayne discussed front and rear board orientation and connector
pin labeling. See figure 8-1. The goal is to keep pin labeling
the same. Members asked that the view be specified and noted
that labeling doesn't match how the connector is labeled. Roger
Hinsdale, IBM, voiced concern regarding whether rework staff would
understand the labeling. Discussion continued regarding in-line
layout. Rear boards must be mirror images of front boards. Wayne
presented 1.2 edit changes to Chap 3. Added VME64x backplane
end dimensions. Mike Thompson, Schroff, noted that we can't mix
existing and new backplanes. These changes will be incorporated
into 1.3. Paul Fischer, FORCE, updated the CR/CSR section. More
edits will be accepted. Good comments have been received from
Dick DeBock and Ed Barsoti. Wayne plans another draft iteration
by September meeting. A task group ballot will be held after
September for November review. John Rynearson will look at how
to form the ANSI ballot group as quickly as possible, perhaps
in parallel with task group process. Dennis Terry asked if we
couldn't do a ballot review in real time over a one or two day
period. John Rynearson asked if we don't need an interim ballot
before the September meeting. Dick Somes asked that members get
issues into Wayne as quickly as possible.
*** BREAK ***
2eVME Protocol Update, Bob Downing, UICC
2eVME protocol was included
in draft 1.2 of VME64x. Bob discussed several issues and asked
members to carefully review the protocol and provide him with
comments. One member asked a question regarding the address phase.
Bob notes that the protocol is trying to provide information
for H.A. VME. Geographical addresses comes from the source.
Chau asked for a plan on timing diagrams.
IP I/O Mapping (VITA 4.1-199x), Wayne Fischer
Wayne discussed the need
for standardized pin assignment for I/O out the rear on both VME64x
and CompactPCI. A task group has been formed to develop this
standard. Supporters are Motorola, FORCE, and Greensprings.
A preliminary draft was distributed. The technical expert is
Kim Rubin, Greensprings. One task group ballot has been held.
Only one ballot was received. Wayne will go out for another
task group ballot. Ray raises concern regarding mixing of CompactPCI
and VME64x in the same standard. Shouldn't the CompactPCI pin
assignment standard goes to PICMG? Wayne argued that it makes
logical sense to include this into VITA 4.1. Dick Somes asked
how BASC feels about CompactPCI pin assignment being added to
P1386. Joe George said that he isn't concerned about it. More
discussion followed. Wayne noted the different between specifications
and standards. Eike Waltz noted that standards organizations
are more willing to accept and build on consortia developed standards.
Harry Andreas, Hughes, suggested that we separate standard based
and non standards based information in the document. Ray noted
that only PICMG owns the pins on the CompactPCI specification
and that we cannot define the use of these pins. Dick Somes suggested
we look at it in the opposite light. Compliance to VITA 4.1 requires
acceptance of the pin assignment. Rays stated that PICMG must
provide indemnification to VITA for standardizing these pins.
Wayne noted that the pins in question are user defined pins and
that they belong to the user. Ray claimed that we must receive
permission and legal indemnification from PICMG. Wayne said
that he and Dick Somes can get such a letter from PICMG. Dick
Somes stated that we should asked that they not define some other
pin assignment for IP in conflict with VITA 4.1. John Rynearson
stated that the issue depends on how PICMG specification defines
the user i/o pins. Ray stated that we are a body of manufacturers
and that this is different than users. Joe George noted that
IEEE uses the process of coordination to alert all of these potential
issues. Bob McKee, MITRE, asked if we shouldn't have two standards.
Chau Pham, Motorola, suggested that VITA 4.1 only contain pin
assignments for VME64x and that PICMG do their own standard.
Tim Marchant, Spectrum Signal, asked Wayne why he chose to put
them together. Wayne explains that VME64x and CompactPCI have
much in common and he wanted to combine efforts.
VME64 Connector Update, Dave Robak, Harting
Dave discussed production
availability. Prototypes are no longer available since production
is now available. Literature will be available in one week.
Rear I/O schedule has been modified. Shroud should be available
in 8 weeks or less. Transition connector should be available
at the end of October. Backplane connectors are press fit. R/A(right
angle) connector is solder technology. It can be wave soldered
or reflowed. It is a high temp polymer. There will be a press
fit R/A perhaps in mid 1997. Harting is going through qualification
testing with Bellcore, IEC 603.2, and specific military specs.
Harting is working with 603.2 chair to put this into IEC arena.
Jim Koser, BERG, questioned whether or not EIA effort should
be discontinued. Minor assembly improvements are being made and
will be completed by August. Harting will support simulation.
5x5 multi-line model is available. A non-disclosure agreement
is required. Will provide results of simulation within 2 days
of request.
Wayne Fischer notes that
P0/J0 specified at 250 insertions/extractions. Should this be
changed to 400 or 500. Mike Munroe asked how many need class
1 500 cycles. Dave Robak states that DIN and IEC are really the
same test even though different numbers are used. Dave Robak
will coordinate a discussion through the VITA reflector on this
issue and Wayne will put information into next VME64x document.
P1101.10 and P1101.11 Report, Eike Waltz, Rittal
IEEE 1101.1 has been reaffirmed
until 2000. A PAR has been opened for editorial corrections.
Editorial changes can be made any time within the next four years.
IEEE Draft P1101.10 in process
for September IEEE Standards Board approval.
IEEE Draft P1101.11 will
have a working group ballot in September. Most issues have been
resolved. Eike hopes to complete sponsor ballot by the end of
the year.
Eike noted that there are
patent issues which he is trying to get resolved.
*** Lunch ***
VIPA Report, Bob Downing, UICC
Bob discussed the development
of the VMEbus for Physics Applications document. Currently the
document is draft 0.1, 11 July 1996. The goal of the document
is to develop standard recommended practices to cover a number
of common physic uses of VME. See the following web site - http://www-vipa.fnal.gov
for a draft of the document. VIPA will be having a meeting the
second week of August to review and hopefully make the document
available. VITA will be the caretaker of the document.
There will be a Nuclear
Science Symposium and Medical Image Processing Conference in November.
Bob passed out information. See attachment.
Bob reported on the 9U Format
task group ballot. Only one negative was received. Only 48%
of the ballots were returned. Bob will try to get more of the
ballots turned in. One comment was of concern regarding 2 mm
connectors and a Bellcore standard. Bob asked Elwood Parsons
to review concerns. These issues will take more study to determine
if the problems noted are valid. Elwood noted that older requirements
were developed around 10 mm trace usage and may not be valid in
today's sub 10 mm trace environment.
VITA 6.1, SCSA Extension Review, Lou Francz, Dialogics
The document and Lou's cover
letter were sent out, but the task group ballot was not included.
The VITA office will send out a ballot next week for a 30 day
task group ballot. Lou will report on the results at the next
VSO meeting.
Cellbus on VMEbus Presentation, Daniel Upp, TranSwitch
TranSwitch would like to
make Cellbus a VME P2 standard. Cellbus is based on ATM technology.
Certain technology in Cellbus is patented. TranSwitch will provide
a license on a fair and non discriminatory basis. Cellbus is
a shared bus with synchronous operation and uses central arbitration.
It supports unicast, multicast, and broadcast cell transfers.
See attached presentation. Cellbus uses GTL on the backplane.
Primary target market is telecom. Power dissipation is a concern.
Clock is not GTL. Clock rates up to 25 MHz are achievable.
Sign-up interest sheet was sent around. Contact John Rynearson
at VITA office, techdir@vita.com, or Daniel Upp at TranSwitch,
dan@txc.com, if you are interested in this effort.
Study Group Formation, Harry Andreas, Hughes
Harry presented a proposal
for an airflow VME module. Airflow provides up to 2x cooling
potential with this technology. Based on Harry's request official
study group status was granted. A sign-up interest sheet was sent
around. Contact John Rynearson at VITA office (techdir@vita.com)
or Harry Andreas, Hughes, handreas@msmail4.hac.com, if you are
interested in this effort.
Software Standard for VME, Jim Pangburn, Fermi
Jim is asking to form a
task group. Fermi is moving from Fastbus to VME. They are interested
in a "plug and play" environment with commercial support.
Hardware requirements are met by VME64 and VME64x. Software
requirements are still to be met. A software standard would provide
users with interoperability and expand market for producers.
Jim is proposing work that has been going on at Fermi within the
VIPA/VME-P Specification. The name of the spec is VISION. The
Fermi implementation is FISION. This effort is not the same as
ESSE effort which is more global. VISION specifies an API for
software running on a master. VISION is object based and network-enabled.
"Components" are used to implement slave access mechanisms.
Sign-up interest sheet has been sent around. Contact John Rynearson
at VITA office (techdir@vita.com) or Jim Pangburn, Fermi, (pangburn@fnal.fnal.gov),
if you are interested in this effort. General discussion of software
standards followed. Group suggests that Jim accept study group
status and report back to members in September regarding overlap
with ESSE.
P1386, P1386.1 Report, Wayne Fischer
Wayne gave an update on
PMC. The P1386.2 S-Bus defined form factor is being dropped.
Wayne indicates that there is no interest in Futurebus options.
Those references are being removed. CompactPCI will be added.
Ballot body will be reconstituted. Otherwise mechanics have
not been changed. Dennis discussed the function of the PRESENT
pin. Some manufacturers are implementing it and some are not.
H.A. VME, Wayne Fischer
This effort is on the back
burner until VME64x is completed. Wayne indicated that he will
not have time to work on this effort for another 4-5 months.
Lou Francz will take over chair and Bob McKee will take vice chair
position.
Wayne noted that there is
great interest to do hot swap in PCI. He states that we can learn
from their effort. Some chips appear to be hot swappable while
others are not. Intel will support an effort to develop hot swap
PCI cards. Wayne notes that much of the effort is in the software.
QuickRing Report, Dennis Terry
Dennis indicates that he
is standing down as chair. No other individual has indicated
interest in picking up the chair position. Therefore this study
group is disbanded.
The meeting was adjourned
until Thursday morning.
Introductions, Dick Somes
Dick Somes called the meeting
to order and asked members to introduce themselves.
2eVME Break Out Meeting Report, Bob Downing
The group reviewed specific
timing issues regarding 2eVME. The group noted that the two strobe
lines are critical in achieving incident wave switching. Two
reserved pins could be used as 2eVME only strobe lines instead
of trying to use current strobe lines.
VME2000 LLC Breakfast Meeting Report, Wayne Fischer
Wayne reported that as currently
configured a VME system will not support incident wave switching
for boards in the middle of a system. Two new lines could be
used for strobes. These lines do not have legacy issues. VME2000
will go back to Robert Cutler with this scenario for simulation.
If ETL doesn't work for these lines, then BTL drivers for these
lines only will be investigated. The VME2000 LLC will have a
conference call in about two weeks to review the results. The
simulation will focus on resolving issues to achieve 20 Megatransfers/second.
Autobahn Report, Hermann Strass, Technology Consulting
A task group ballot has
been completed. Twelve ballots were sent out. Six were affirmative,
one vote negative, and five abstained. Hermann will respond to
the negative ballot.
CXC Modpack Report, Hermann Strass, Technology Consulting
A task group ballot has
been completed with eight balloters. Two were negative, five
were affirmative, and one abstained. Hermann will respond to
the two negative ballots.
MVIP Status, John Rynearson
John noted MVIP was in the
midst of a negative ballot review for their last task group ballot.
Several issues remained to be resolved before MVIP can be moved
out of the task group ballot stage. One issue of major importance
is that MVIP has lost one of its sponsors. Natural Microsystems
membership in VITA has lapsed. VSO Policies and Procedures require
either that a new member be added, that the task group petition
the VSO membership to continue with only two sponsors, or that
the task group move back to study group status. John will write
a letter to Charlie Snell, Xircom, informing Charlie of the remedies.
Busnet Status, John Rynearson for Paul Fischer, FORCE
John Rynearson submitted
an email report from Paul Fischer for the minutes. See the following.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An update regarding BusNet
for your upcoming VITA meeting in Ottawa, Canada.
A working group mail alias has been established for the purpose of
electronically distributing proposals and discussion associated with
those proposals. Only the working group members are on this alias.
(This is not an automated list-server that one can automatically join,
it is a simple forwarding
alias.)
Work is in progress to create a web-based discussion thread/forum for
the working group on the FORCE www server. This effort is in progress
and it is not clear how long until it is ready. I hope before the end
of this year!!
Additional background information regarding BusNet is available on the
FORCE web page. Is it possible
to provide a link from the VITA page titled:
http://www.vita.com/vso/std-tabs.html
to the FORCE page titled:
http://www.forcecomputers.com/technology/busnet/busnet.html
If you check the above link you will find the published information that
is available today. As additional information becomes available it will
be added to this page.
Nine proposals have been submitted to the mail alias
(busnet-wg@force.de) and discussion is now beginning. I expect the
working group to be present at the September VITA meeting in Phoenix (?)
so we may discuss these issues directly and vote on these proposals.
Will you be able to accommodate
us at the Phoenix meeting?
There are nine working group
members. They are:
tbarr@fci.com (Terrence Barr, FORCE Computers)
tbrown@homer.nwscc.sea06.navy.mil (Tim Brown)
donaghey@apollo.hp.com (Bob Donaghey, Hewlett-Packard)
pfischer@force.de (Paul Fischer, FORCE Computers)
franczl@dialogic.com (Lou Francz, Dialogics)
mag@sysgo.de (Marius Groeger, SYSGO)
stku@force.de (Stefan Kuntz, FORCE Computers)
pangburn@b0su01.fnal.gov (Jim Pangburn, Fermi National Acc. Lab)
nps@radstone.co.uk (Nigel
P Street, Radstone Technology)
I expect most members to attend the September. Please provide me with
the information I must send to these people for the purpose of
registering, etc. ASAP! I will be on vacation the first three weeks of
August so please also CC "busnet-wg@force.de" so all members of the
working group will receive
this important information.
Sincerely,
Paul
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Paul Fischer voice: +49/89/608-14-334
FORCE COMPUTERS GmbH fax: +49/89/608-14-276
Prof.-Messerschmitt-Str. 1 e-mail: pafi@force.de
D-85579 Neubiberg/Munich,
Germany
http://www.forcecomputers.com/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Procedural Question Discussion
Wayne Fischer asked what
the status of a standard is between the time it is approved within
the VSO and when it is recognized by ANSI. Does it maintain its
draft status. Is it a VITA standard and if so what does that
imply. Wayne asked if the task group must maintain three members
through the ANSI process. A general discussion followed. John
Rynearson offered to research this issue and recommend a course
of action via the VITA reflector. Ray Alderman voiced his concern
about requiring general VSO approval beyond the task group. He
stated that he felt that this put the task group into double jeopardy.
More discussion followed. Dick Somes stated that he felt we
should not imply that a standard that has VSO approval is a standard.
It should remain a draft. Dick Somes offers to work with John
on this issue. Ray will provide input. A straw vote on this
issue was taken. The vote was 11 for changing the procedures
and 14 against changing procedures.
The group continued to discuss
whether or not there should be VSO or VITA only standards. Jing
Kwok, DY4, stated that he felt that people did not understand
the importance of the addition of the ANSI term to the final standard.
More discussion followed. Ray cautioned the group not to raise
unnecessary barriers that created more work for the task groups.
Dick Somes noted that we require negative ballot comments to
contain requirements for turning the ballot positive and that
this requirement helps keep the process positive. The current
naming standard will be reviewed also.
Front Panel Data Port, Jonathan Jones, ICS
This concept came out of
work by Sky and Mercury. ICS further developed the concept that
is called Front Panel Data Port. It is a 32 bit parallel data
flow synchronous bus. No addressing is done. Original design
was point to point. Some manufacturers currently support multidrop
capability. Good for applications that need additional bandwidth.
Supporters are Mercury, Sky, and ICS. Two drafts have been produced
to date. The task group is currently trying to get some timing
and loading numbers. Current plans are to have the next draft
by October 1996. A number of manufacturers currently support
some form of FPDP. Some manufacturers provide FPDP through PMC
modules. A VMEbus interface with a FibreChannel to FPDP bridge
is being developed by Atlantic Aerospace Corp. An ATM bridge
to FPDP is also being worked on. FPDP is an existing industry
practice. The task group's goal is to create a formal standard
based on the existing industry practice.
VME on SEM-E, Mary Mosier
Mary presented two possible
pin assignments for 372 pin and 396 pin connectors. The options
in the draft are for the 396 connector. This connector will be
worked on first. Mary showed how additional traces can be used
to provide ground shielding on the backplane. This is a new pin
assignment and does not reflect previous pin assignments. Wayne
Fischer advised Mary to have a simulation done to determine potential
noise problems. Mary agreed that a simulation was needed. She
asked members to provide her with their input.
SPCI Update, Jim Koser
Revision 1 May 1996 has
been released by the PCI SIG. It is available from their office.
CCPMC Report, Jing Kwok
The words are done. Drawing
remain to be created. Shock and vibration testing is being done.
These tests need to be done with the 160 pin connector VME base
level board.
Meeting Wrap-up
Action Items
Wayne Fischer and Dick Somes
will contact PICMG regarding the specification of CompactPCI user
i/o lines in a proposed ANSI/VITA standard.
John Rynearson, Ray Alderman,
and Dick Somes will draft a proposal for discussion regarding
clarification of the status of a specification after it receives
final task group approval and before it receives final ANSI approval.
The proposal will also discuss the status of specifications that
receive task group approval within the VSO but are never submitted
for ANSI recognition.
Wayne Fischer will mail
out the next VME64x update before the September meeting.
Ray Alderman noted that
the VXI consortium would like to come to the VSO and discuss their
efforts in the area of "Plug and Play". Ray will asked
them to attend the next meeting.
Discussion Items
SHALL vs. MUST, Wayne Fischer
Wayne feels that we need
a consistent style. A discussion followed. Wayne suggests we
put the style and tool issue on the agenda for the next meeting.
Keymark, Hermann Strass
The Keymark is a way to
mark that your product meets all appropriate European standards.
It is being done by CEN and CENELEC. Keymark is optional and
not a requirement. The Keymark is for consumers while CE mark
is for authorities. Use of Keymark does not eliminate the need
for the CE mark.
Hermann noted that this
year is the 15th anniversary of VMEbus. He notes that Oct. 16
was the announcement date at Systems 81 in Munich.
Ray Alderman noted that
RTC is offering double pages for companies which desire to advertise
and document their history in VMEbus. The VITA Journal will also
be highlighting the anniversary. Ray also discussed the US and
European editors email reflector "wire" service that
he is creating for use by VITA members. These services will be
available shortly.
Future Meeting Dates
The group discussed future
meeting dates. The September meeting will be the 11-12 at the
Airport Hilton in Phoenix.
The November meeting will
tentatively be held in Del Mar, California on November 13-14.
Several hotels are still being considered.
The January meeting is tentatively
scheduled for the 15-16 in Salt Lake City. No hotel has yet been
selected.
The March meeting is scheduled
for either the 19-20 or the 12-13 for Florida. The meeting will
most likely be held in either Orlando or St. Petersburg.
There being no more business
to conduct Dick Somes adjourned the meeting.
Minutes submitted by Jim Koser, BERG, and John Rynearson, VITA.